top of page

Colorado's Contentious Social Media Bill: A Closer Look at Its Implications on Free Speech and Drug Education


Colorado's recent legislative move—Senate Bill 24-158—has stirred significant debate and concern among advocates of legal substances and free speech. The bill, which aims to implement age verification and stringent content policies on social media platforms, mandates the removal of users promoting controlled substances, including legal psychedelics and some over-the-counter medications. This sweeping measure, despite excluding medical and retail marijuana for users over twenty-one, poses a chilling effect on discussions surrounding various legal substances like cough syrups and certain hemp products.


Critically, the bill's broad language extends to nearly all hemp-containing products intended for human consumption that aren't classified specifically as dietary supplements or foods, setting a precarious standard that may hinder even benign conversations about these products online. The implications are profound, not only limiting free expression but also potentially stifling educational discourse on the medicinal benefits of such substances, thereby impacting public knowledge and health choices.


Moreover, the enforcement of these policies could lead to complex legal challenges, as it requires social media platforms to police content stringently, potentially leading to over-censorship or inconsistent application of the rules. The bill also grants substantial power to the state to monitor and penalize individuals and companies discussing these substances, raising questions about the balance between state control and individual freedoms.


While the bill intends to protect minors from illicit substance exposure online, the broad sweep of its language and the implications for legal substance discussion have led to criticisms of overreach. Stakeholders like Kevin Matthews, a leading figure in Denver's psilocybin decriminalization, have voiced concerns that such policies could severely handicap the burgeoning psychedelic ecosystem, which relies heavily on public education and open dialogue.


Do you believe Colorado's new social media bill is an infringement on free speech regarding the discussion of legal substances?

  • Yes, it's an unnecessary restriction.

  • No, it protects the public.

  • Unsure, more discussion is needed.





Comments


News (2).png
News (4).png
Check back soon
Once posts are published, you’ll see them here.
bottom of page