top of page

Renowned Cannabis Brand Faces Legal Challenge for Vape Sales in Georgia



In a recent legal development, a high-profile lawsuit has spotlighted a controversial tactic within the cannabis sector. California-based cannabis enterprises have been navigating a grey area, enabling them to distribute their products nationwide. This strategy has been a financial boon for the industry, which is facing economic challenges. However, the legality of these operations is under scrutiny.


A class-action lawsuit initiated in Georgia targets Cookies and Stiiizy, two leading Californian cannabis brands, along with nine other entities. The lawsuit alleges that these companies have contravened federal statutes by marketing marijuana vape pens in the state, demanding $150 million in compensatory damages.


The crux of the matter stems from legislative alterations in 2018 that federally decriminalized hemp, leading to a distinction between hemp and marijuana that remains contentious. The revised legislation introduced a category of "hemp-derived intoxicants," capable of producing psychoactive effects, which are now available in various forms, including Delta-8-THC and THCA cannabis products, even in regions where marijuana remains illegal.



Prominent Californian companies have seized this opportunity. Cookies, renowned for its significant market presence, openly promotes the shipping of THCA cannabis to consumers in states with strict marijuana laws, like Arkansas and Alabama. Similarly, Stiiizy is implicated in the lawsuit for its sale of Delta-8-THC hemp vape pens in Georgia. Additionally, Cann, a cannabis beverage brand partially owned by Gwyneth Paltrow, markets its products in Texas.


In response to inquiries, Cookies has refrained from commenting due to the ongoing legal proceedings. Stiiizy, on the other hand, has dismissed the lawsuit's accusations as unfounded, asserting its readiness to contest the charges vehemently.


The federal government's silence on interstate cannabis commerce has led to speculation about the enforcement of legal standards, paving the way for civil lawsuits like the one in Georgia to emerge as a means of legal redress. Hilary Bricken, a lawyer specializing in corporate cannabis law, suggests that the absence of federal regulation on hemp-derived cannabinoids might be prompting these legal actions.

The lawsuit leverages the RICO statutes, initially designed to combat organized crime, highlighting the complexities of pursuing such cases. Despite the challenges, the plaintiffs' status as individuals could sway public and judicial sympathy against large corporations accused of illegal sales practices.


This case exemplifies the evolving legal and regulatory challenges facing the cannabis industry, especially as companies navigate the fine line between innovation and compliance.




Comments


News (2).png
News (4).png
Check back soon
Once posts are published, you’ll see them here.
bottom of page